Being described somewhere you do not own

The direct traffic from a listing is usually modest. The reason to do it anyway is that a product described in twelve places is a product that exists, and a product described in one place is a domain somebody registered.

Run the free check

Directory listings do two things: they send a small continuous trickle of visitors, and more importantly they create third-party descriptions of your product. Search engines and AI assistants both weight descriptions written by somebody other than the owner, so twelve listings with genuinely different descriptions are worth considerably more than twelve copies of one paragraph.

The reason that is not traffic

Most advice about directories frames them as a traffic source, which sets the wrong expectation and leads people to quit after the first few produce a handful of visits.

The larger effect is evidential. Search engines and AI assistants are both trying to establish, from the outside, whether a product exists and what it does. Your own homepage is a claim you made about yourself, and it is expected to be favourable. A page on a site you do not control, describing your product, is a different kind of evidence.

This is why the listing work matters disproportionately for a new domain. You cannot quickly manufacture years of people discussing you. You can, in a few afternoons, go from being described in one place to being described in a dozen.

Write each one fresh

This is the single instruction that decides whether the effort is worth anything, and almost everybody ignores it.

The efficient-seeming approach is to write one description and paste it into every submission form. It takes an hour instead of an afternoon and it produces something close to one piece of evidence repeated twelve times rather than twelve pieces of evidence.

Write each listing to emphasise a different aspect: one leads with the problem it solves, one with who it is for, one with what makes it different, one with the specific situation it handles best. All true, all different.

The practical benefit is that each description can match a different question. A person, or an assistant, looking for a tool that handles one particular case will find the listing that mentions that case.

The order to work through

Roughly by how much each is worth relative to the effort, for a product that launched recently.

  • The places you already control: your repository description and README, your own profiles, any organisation page. Free, immediate, and frequently forgotten.
  • Product Hunt, for the permanent listing page rather than the launch day. It is a page about your product on a domain with substantial established trust.
  • The general software comparison sites, where people go specifically to find alternatives to something. These are heavily used as sources when assistants are asked to compare tools.
  • The category directories for your specific field, which are smaller and considerably better targeted.
  • The communities where your users are, through genuine participation rather than submission, which is slower and produces the best evidence of all.
  • Wikidata, when the product is genuinely notable enough to qualify, which is later than most founders think.

Telling a real directory from a farm

A large number of directories exist to sell submissions rather than to help anybody find anything, and being listed on them is worth nothing and occasionally worse than nothing.

The tests are straightforward and take a minute each. Does the site have visible signs of real use, such as recent activity, comments, or dated entries? Does it rank for anything itself, which you can check by searching for a distinctive phrase from one of its pages? Is the listing editorially reviewed, or does anything submitted appear automatically?

The clearest signal is the business model. If the primary offer is paid inclusion, and especially if the pitch is submission to hundreds of directories at once, that is a service selling the appearance of the work rather than the work.

When in doubt, ask whether you would use this site to find a tool. If not, nobody else is either.

What a good listing contains

Treat each submission as a page you are writing rather than a form you are filling in, because that is what it becomes.

Lead with what the product does for a person, in the plain words they would use. The first sentence is usually the only part that gets quoted elsewhere, so it has to work alone.

Be specific about the situation it suits, and where the form allows it, honest about what it does not do. A description naming its own limits is a better source for anything trying to match a person to a tool, and it reaches the people the product actually fits.

Point the link at your custom domain, not a generated subdomain, and at a page that explains the product rather than a signup wall. And use the same product name everywhere, spelled identically, since inconsistent naming across listings makes it harder for anything to establish that these entries describe one thing.

Keeping them current

A listing is not finished when it is submitted, and stale listings are a quiet liability.

The most common failure is a domain move. You buy a proper domain, redirect everything, and forget that fourteen directories still point at the old address. Some of them will not follow a redirect indefinitely, and some display the old address as text.

Keep a simple list of every place you are listed, with the address of your entry and the login you used. This sounds excessive until the first time you change your product name or your domain and have to reconstruct it from memory.

Review the list once or twice a year. Update anything describing a version of the product that no longer exists, because a confident wrong description circulating about you is worse than no description at all.

Every part of this, in detail

Each section below is a full guide of its own, on one specific piece of the problem.

  • Judging a directory: Every list of the best directories you will read was written by somebody who did not measure the results for your product in your category. Here is how to run the checks yourself instead.
  • Comparison sites: Somebody searching for alternatives to a product has already decided they want something else. That is the highest intent a stranger can have, and there is a category of site built entirely around it.
  • Your repository: A public repository is a page about your project on a domain search engines trust deeply. Most of them carry no description, no website link, no topics, and a readme that says how to install dependencies.
  • The first links: Your domain has nothing pointing at it, which is one of the reasons search engines have no opinion about it yet. These ten are available to everybody, cost nothing, and are entirely legitimate.

Part of a larger guide

This page is one part of Vibe coding SEO. The other parts:

Questions people ask

Are directory listings worth it for a new product?
Yes, for a reason larger than their traffic. They create descriptions of your product on sites you do not control, which is the kind of evidence search engines and AI assistants use to establish that a product exists and what it does. Your own homepage is a claim about yourself and is expected to be favourable.
Can I use the same description for every listing?
You can, and it wastes most of the value. Twelve copies of one paragraph is close to one piece of evidence repeated rather than twelve. Write each one to emphasise something different, so each can match a different question somebody might ask.
How do I tell a real directory from a link farm?
Check for visible signs of real use such as recent activity and dated entries, search for a distinctive phrase from one of its pages to see whether it ranks for anything itself, and look at the business model. A pitch offering submission to hundreds of directories at once is selling the appearance of the work.
Should I pay for directory submissions?
Almost never at this stage. Paid inclusion as a primary business model is the clearest signal that a directory exists to sell submissions rather than to help anybody find anything. A useful test is whether you would personally use the site to find a tool.
What should a listing description say?
Lead with what the product does for a person in plain words, since the first sentence is often the only part quoted elsewhere and has to work alone. Be specific about the situation it suits and honest about what it does not do, which makes it a better source for matching a person to a tool.
Do I need to maintain listings after submitting?
Yes. The most common failure is a domain move, where you redirect everything and forget that a dozen directories still point at the old address. Keep a list of every entry with its address and login, and review it once or twice a year for descriptions of a product version that no longer exists.

See how your product is currently described

The free Get Found Check looks at what your own pages say about you, which is the description every listing you write should be consistent with.

Run the free check Have Licheo do it for you