Why does my page need to work for people who never visited it?

Because in considered purchases the reader often forwards it to whoever else must agree. That second reader is sceptical and has no context, and enthusiasm does not survive forwarding while specifics do.

What should I include for a sceptical reader?

Exactly what is included and excluded, the process with timescales, what you need from them, what tends to go wrong, a fair comparison with alternatives, and evidence with names and sourced figures.

Should I address objections directly on the page?

Yes. The objection will be raised whether or not you mention it. Addressing it lets you frame the answer rather than leaving your supporter to improvise a defence that may not be accurate.

How do I make a page easy to quote?

Write short, self-contained statements of fact rather than paragraphs that only make sense in sequence. The same quality makes the page easier for AI assistants to cite when somebody asks for a recommendation.

Will all this detail bore the first reader?

Not if it is arranged well. Keep the opening clear and human, and put the substance beneath it under headings a sceptic can jump to. Both readers then get what they came for.

Write for the person who never visited your site

For anything expensive, the person reading your page is often gathering evidence to present to somebody else. That somebody else is more sceptical, has less context, and will not be charmed.

Have the agents build my site

In considered purchases, your page gets forwarded to people who did not choose to read it. Enthusiasm does not survive forwarding; specifics do. Include the concrete facts a sceptical colleague needs: exactly what is included, how the process works, what it depends on, what could go wrong, and how you compare with the alternatives.

The reader you did not plan for

Somebody spends an hour on your site, becomes convinced, and then has to convince a partner, a manager, or a committee. They send a link. That second reader arrives cold, sceptical, and looking for reasons to say no.

Most pages are written entirely for the first reader. The second one meets a page full of confident language and no substance, and confident language is precisely what a sceptic distrusts.

What survives being forwarded

Concrete material travels. Vague material does not. A sceptical reader is looking for things they can check, compare or object to specifically, and giving them those is what makes the page useful as an argument.

Exactly what is included, and what is not.
What the process is, step by step, with timescales.
What it depends on from their side.
What tends to go wrong, and how it is handled.
How you compare with the obvious alternatives, fairly.
Evidence: named examples, real figures where you can source them.

Answer the objection you would rather avoid

Every purchase has an awkward question. It is too expensive. It will take too long. We could do it ourselves. Somebody else is cheaper. The sceptic will raise it whether or not your page addresses it.

Addressing it directly is far stronger than hoping. It also lets you frame the answer, rather than leaving the person who liked you to improvise a defence they may not get right.

Make it easy to be quoted

The person forwarding your page will copy a sentence or two into a message. Write so that such sentences exist: short, self-contained statements of fact rather than paragraphs that only make sense in sequence.

This has a useful side effect. The same quality that makes a passage easy for a colleague to quote makes it easy for an AI assistant to cite, which is increasingly where shortlists are formed.

Provide the practical details finance will ask for

In organisations, an approval usually needs mundane information: what exactly is being bought, over what period, on what terms, and what happens if it stops. Pages rarely include any of it.

Adding a short, plain section covering those removes a round of emails and prevents the enthusiasm from cooling while somebody waits for answers.

Do not lose the first reader

None of this means writing a specification document. The person who arrived first still needs a page that is readable and human, or they never reach the point of forwarding anything.

The workable arrangement is a clear, persuasive page with the substantive detail present further down, organised under headings a sceptic can jump to. Both readers get what they need.

How Licheo writes these pages

The copywriter agent writes for both readers: a clear opening for the person who arrived, and specific, quotable detail beneath it for the person who was sent the link.

The same specificity is what makes a page citable by AI assistants, so writing for the sceptical colleague and writing for machine retrieval turn out to be the same job.

Part of a larger guide

This page is one part of Better clients, not more. The other parts:

Questions people ask

Why does my page need to work for people who never visited it?: Because in considered purchases the reader often forwards it to whoever else must agree. That second reader is sceptical and has no context, and enthusiasm does not survive forwarding while specifics do.
What should I include for a sceptical reader?: Exactly what is included and excluded, the process with timescales, what you need from them, what tends to go wrong, a fair comparison with alternatives, and evidence with names and sourced figures.
Should I address objections directly on the page?: Yes. The objection will be raised whether or not you mention it. Addressing it lets you frame the answer rather than leaving your supporter to improvise a defence that may not be accurate.
How do I make a page easy to quote?: Write short, self-contained statements of fact rather than paragraphs that only make sense in sequence. The same quality makes the page easier for AI assistants to cite when somebody asks for a recommendation.
Will all this detail bore the first reader?: Not if it is arranged well. Keep the opening clear and human, and put the substance beneath it under headings a sceptic can jump to. Both readers then get what they came for.

Write for both readers

A clear page for the person who arrived, and quotable substance for the sceptic they forward it to.

Have the agents build my site Read the full guide